Simon Vouet's The Toilet of Venus meant little to you.
And you figured that you could survive
without ever seeing The Death of Marat again.
You decided
standing at the used-book counter
that if you went the rest of your life and never again laid eyes
on Georges de La Tour's Joseph the Carpenter
or Goya's The Third of May, 1808,
or even Decorative Figure against an Ornamental Background
where you found the influence of Cubism come to rest
against the classical tradition during a Tuesday afternoon lecture last fall
it would be worth it.
The High Baroque style of The Blinding of Samson
a clear example of the aesthetic Rembrandt developed after moving to Amsterdam
was something you would just as soon forget
its theatrical light and violence reminding you
perhaps
in an Old-Testament sort of way
of the time you were forced by your parents to play
the part of Moses in the school's spring production.
Or you felt uneasy when you drew the easy parallel
between Samson's infatuation with Delilah
and your own
and realized the way the old cliché
about love and blindness becomes too real.
And Oppenheim's Object, you reasoned,
wasn't really art at all
just a cup of tea gone horribly wrong
and the snow shovel hadn't lived up to its promise
of being In Advance of the Broken Arm
even when your professor insisted that it was a playful and
spontaneous challenge to the very nature of art.
You were not moved by
Madonna and Child Enthroned between Saints and Angels
At the Moulin Rouge
or The Blinding of Polyphemos and Gorgons on a Proto-Attic amphora.
You were not moved by
The Glass of Absinthe
or The Abduction of the Sabine Woman
or White and Greens in Blue.
Not even by the image of the sacred visiting the earth with tangible immediacy
in St. Matthew and the Angel.
But what you couldn't do without
what you trimmed so carefully
from the top-right corner of page 221
was figure 11-6: West facade, Notre-Dame, Paris.
And I am left to imagine
the Gothic architecture
the Rose window
the twin towers
and to wonder who she was
that you couldn't let it go.
You even left the right margin of the page
edge of the Parisian sky and a glimpse of roof tops
tucked inside the book
as if to prove that you really had no interest
in any of it
except for this.
3 comments:
I adore this.
Is this the one on which you were working this Monday?
Yes, this one is brought to you in part by Jess and the used book sale.
Thanks also go to the Sophomore College Experience for providing time to work.
Is there anything I love more than titles? Than collections? Than art? Than poetry?
Yes: a poem of collected art titles.
What a thing you've made!
I like this for the reasons I liked Collins' Canada, only I like it more because art titles mean more than the adventures of "Cherry Ames". Also, this poem goes to a significant end. (By the way, now I'm not sorry your book wasn't intact).
It addresses the problem I have with much of Collins' work--where it is whimsical, and accessible, and funny, but those things become a substitute for sincere commentary.
This is how titles should be collected.
This is why you are supposed to keep your blog--thanks for sharing this.
Post a Comment